Online shopping is increasing dramatically. How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of jobs required?
These days, the ubiquity of online shopping has had great impact on every aspects of our lives. Although there has been growing evidence of the adverse influence of online shopping on the environment, I agree that this way of shopping has given rise to certain types of jobs and the economic growth, which is a positive.
On the one hand, environmental destruction may stem from the proliferation of online shopping. First, since goods need to be delivered thousands of miles to reach customers, it is necessary that such goods are well-packaged, increasing the volume of trash significantly. In fact, almost goods shipped are packaged in one box, or even luxurious goods are protected in double-box packaging, which means that tones of plastic, cartons are used just for the protection of the goods and become useless afterwards. Second, transportation is a prerequisite to the shipping of goods purchased on the Internet, which means that online shopping has plagued the environment considerably by giving a rise to the emissions from transportation. For instance, some research has revealed that shipping accounted for around 30% of global emissions of carbon dioxide in 2019.
On the other hand, online purchases has made certain types of jobs increase in popularity and mitigated demand for some jobs as well. Firstly, in order to meet the increased demand of customers, big retailers, providers,... have employed numbers of people to work as shippers. This means that thanks to a large amount of work that does not require high skills or qualifications, many people will no longer unemployed. Secondly, buying merchandises in stores will eventually less prevalent due to the reality that people reap an array of benefits from shopping on the Internet. Recent surveys have found out that most people would opt to buy properties online rather than going to the supermarket.
In conclusion, online shopping has inflicted damage on the environment; nevertheless, it also offers numerous myriad of job opportunities. Besides, its impact should be closely monitored to facilitate a sustainable development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-21 | Mirajanecute | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | phuongphuongt1234 | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-23 | 17142052@student.hcmute.edu.vn | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-25 | tamle | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-25 | tamle | 78 | view |
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of jobs required 89
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- Nowadays most people try to balance between work and other parts of lifes Unfortunately not many achieve this balace What are the problems of this Suggest some solutions to solve the problem Suggest some solutions to solve the problem 84
- Nowadays most people try to balance between work and other parts of lifes Unfortunately not many achieve this balace What are the problems of this Suggest some solutions to solve the problem Suggest some solutions to solve the problem 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...d of customers, big retailers, providers,... have employed numbers of people to wo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34131736527 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07201969894 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595808383234 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1958227266 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.933333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202877124152 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620255320516 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556291177044 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123220032787 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053760747145 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.