The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is undeniably true that imposing harsher penalties for driving offenses can improve road safety. However, I believe that there are a lot of methods that can help to reduce road offenses.
Punishments give motorists a deterrent and a warning to help them make up their mind rightfully. Those crossing a red line and driving under the influence of alcohol would be more cautious if the letter of the law is carried out. As a result, crashes, encounters, and accidents on the road would be reduced, and safety for pedestrians and people riding motorbikes and bicycles would be guaranteed. In fact, the solution has brought such outstanding results that the number of accidents caused by traffic participants in Vietnam has decreased by about 10% in 2020. However, punishments should not be applied to unexpected situations such as crashes happening due to limited vision, construction sites, and problems relating to infrastructure.
I would agree that the governments should promulgate regulations for unfortunate circumstances. The problem of motorists' crashing into pedestrians and other objects because of narrow views can be overcome by installing bulging outward mirrors and lamps in areas with hidden corners. In addition, equipping traffic signals and road signs to warn others of the danger demonstrates itself in reducing hazards from building sites. People working in those areas need to wear luminous protective clothes to reinforce the eyes of traffic participants. On top of that, developing the infrastructure by improving the quality of the road system and traffic lights has succeeded in reducing the number of unexpected accidents in several countries.
To sum up, the positive aspects that strict punishments contribute to road safety are undoubtedly colossal, but it is not the only method, and there are possible methods that can be applied to prevent the dangers when joining traffic.
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people think that it is effective for students to study in a group at school while others think it is better to study alone Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The chart below shows how frequent people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 67
- The diagrams below show how floods happen in a village and give two solutions to deal with them 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, in addition, in fact, such as, as a result, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38666666667 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97878424119 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596666666667 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6183013541 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.307692308 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144912074159 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497735562237 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449517965129 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0958058169724 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322280652886 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.