The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home to work, shopping and education
The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home to work, shopping and education
These days, the traffic issue can be solved by only lower the usage of cars in terms of visiting work places, schools or universities, and shopping. I partly agree that not only replacing traditional way of work and shopping with distance work and online shopping may help to solve the problem, on the contrary government actions can be essential to deal with this problem.
There are beneficial influences of distance work as well as online shopping in overcoming the amount of traffic. If people do the former, this might help traffic to fall significantly. Because, according to the researchers, over 70% city population, who have their own cars, are employed in cities, in other words that percentage of cars may not be driven for the sake of home working. This can lead to decrease traffic jam and make cities relatively quiet. Moreover, online shopping does not require driving car. Most people have to go shopping to consume daily lives at least once every day, but instead of doing this, if they purchase products in online shopping, it can not only prevent traffics from cities, but also help them to save their time.
However, these may not be abundance to tackle this problem without role of government. First, authority can introduce the law to drive only one car for each family. For example, some families might have money to buy more than two or three cars, whereas this kind of law can warn them to drive one car in cities. Unless they follow it, they know that authority can impose fines to them. As a result of it, the number of cars in cities make a balance, which might not cause traffic issues.
In conclusion, changing work styles and shopping habits can be more beneficial to evaluate this issue with the help of government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...which might not cause traffic issues. In conclusion, changing work styles and...
^^^^
Line 6, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...use traffic issues. In conclusion, changing work styles and shopping habits...
^^
Line 6, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d shopping habits can be more beneficial to evaluate this issue with the help of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, whereas, at least, for example, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79867986799 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46387265356 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57095709571 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9250483339 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.857142857 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173045535023 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655491366749 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403100603134 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101504952779 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566328982746 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.