In order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution?
The problems of traffic congestion have become one of the most controversial issues in this modern society. In this situation, some people argue that governments need to inflict heavy taxes on people who own private vehicles and invest their finances in developing public transit. This essay will discuss both the pros and cons of it in detail.
On the one hand, the most significant benefit of the governments' policy regarding imposing high tariff is that a better environment across the world could be expected because many car owners would less take advantage of it due to the high rate of tax fees. Thus, this trend leads to reduce environmental degradation considerably. An excellent example of it is that in some countries, many commuters who go to and from work and many visitors tend to take the underground or buses more often rather than taking their automobiles to avoid paying expensive car ownership payments. However, the levels of environmental pollution have significantly decreased.
On the other hand, there are also a couple of drawbacks to such governments' initiative. Firstly, some enterprises which rely on markets of trades and transport are likely to have a detrimental impact on their businesses' profit immediately. This is because paying too excessive taxes can give a substantial burden on the companies, and as a result, it is difficult for them to increase high productivity and better outcomes effectively. Besides, some people might complain about paying a hefty tariff on account of an unfair tax fee application. It means that the practice of such law would not affect wealthy people, so they would continue to utilise their cars compared with the poor.
In conclusion, the measure of imposing taxes massively concerning car ownership is a double-edged sword because of some issues such as environmental problems, and influences on individual and companies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...both the pros and cons of it in detail. On the one hand, the most significant be...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 54, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...nd, the most significant benefit of the governments policy regarding imposing high tariff i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 655, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pollution have significantly decreased. On the other hand, there are also a coup...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mpared with the poor. In conclusion, the measure of imposing taxes massively ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, so, thus, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97828010009 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598684210526 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3432463954 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.769230769 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140409523257 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431306902267 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413977214754 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0861499700654 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142343988294 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.