Employers nowadays put more emphasis on social skills Some people believe that social skills are important in addition to good qualifications for job success To what extent do you agree or disagree

Many companies seem to look for various job applicants who have good social skills, these days. Some people consider that these types of skills are as crucial as good qualifications. I absolutely, agree with this because of some reasons.

First of all, in businesses, there are plenty of tasks which require many workers to brainstorm and find out the best practical solutions together through diverse projects or discussions. In this situation, having favourable social skills in person is the key to have more opportunities to express their ideas and share with workers. As a result, better consequences with creative notions can be discovered more often.

Secondly, another benefit of excellent interpersonal skills leads to enhance brand images in enterprises potentially. This is because employees who have outstanding communication skills are more likely to develop good relationships with their customers by providing a better credit and trust, so many consumers would recognise those companies as a loyalty business. And ultimately, productive profits in companies can be anticipated at work.

Lastly, social skills are indeed crucial for all workers considerably. If any of the employees are not good at social with co-workers, they can be in danger of being bullying by their colleagues frequently. Since a good bond or communion with others usually create better understanding between people and it is the process of making friends, without this skills, it will be difficult for them to share their opinions or have a conversation with others. Consequently, those who lack social skills would feel lonely and isolated among workers.

In conclusion, as mentioned above, I am entirely in favour of the statement that the interpersonal skills are the essential elements in workplaces like decent qualifications because it gives rise to more positive results in not only work performances for workers but also reducing of being neglected by other at work.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (45 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 367, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... the process of making friends, without this skills, it will be difficult for them t...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, lastly, look, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, as a result, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42580645161 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02786916417 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.9013851046 49.4020404114 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.142857143 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182542760438 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698295697446 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492490595732 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107937047318 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540184125249 0.056905535591 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.