There is no denying the fact that the phenomenon of teaching several students has been replaced by technological advancement.it is ubiquitous across the globe due to its paramount importance. One school of thought opine that it is worthless, however, others consider that a couple of problems also occur because of the same. Although this has a plethora of merits, yet numerous demerits are also there which will be elaborated in upcoming paragraphs.
Initiating with the best possible benefits, the most significant advantage is, students can search and get information regarding anything that will increase their basic knowledge to the utmost. Along with it, children can do research or assignment as various sites are helpful to accomplish their target. To cite an example, students get through knowledge about anything with the images and video clips for if he or she wants to see and know about particular bird-like flesh-eating animals. As a result, the images and video clips give entire information about studies which helps in attain learning.
On the paradoxical side, there are many drawbacks as well. First and foremost, students cannot focus easily because there is a distance between them and teachers. For instance, children cannot look at the screen for a long time which reduces their lack of interest in studying. Secondly, students delay their assignments since their teachers cannot check them effectively. Consequently, the education of children affects badly without proper supervision of the teachers and also children lack self-confidence.
To conclude, without any doubt, this is a mixed bag. If this topic has many positives, then the negative points of this notion may not be underestimated.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, look, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, well, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38518518519 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91983425878 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3214135021 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.857142857 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125692468211 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377250622684 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380328302701 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0726251472742 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241093854064 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.