In the past, most people lived in small villages where everyone knew everyone else. Nowadays, most people live in large cities where they only know a few people in their area.What do you think were the advantages and disadvantages of living in a small com

Earlier, most of the demographics of society lived in the countryside where they are familiar with their people around. A lot of urbanization happened around the world in the recent past due to which many people migrated to larger cities for their livelihood. In this essay, we will discuss the merits and demerits associated with living in smaller communities.
 
To embark with, spending life with a smaller set of the population has a great edge in terms of two major things. Firstly, we can get quick help in times of need as we are already well accustomed to the neighbors. Villages share a common community sentiment which makes them come forward to support each other during the hard times. Secondly, living in villages increases our life span. This is because we would be pollution-free and can have organic food that is protected from chemicals.
 
On the other hand, a village has its disadvantages to reside in. People will have meager opportunities when living in smaller communities. Their standard of living gets greatly affected by minimum wages. The second drawback would be the technology from which they are far of. This is because of the less connectivity with larger cities in terms of transportation. Internet and other infrastructure challenges will also push their development behind.
 
To recapitulate, although the migration to larger communities created less social bonding between the people, we can say that people lives got better with their transfers. Maintaining a healthy relationship when residing in larger groups and areas makes the world a better place to live.  

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed with living in smaller communities.   To embark with, spending life with a sma...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...food that is protected from chemicals.   On the other hand, a village has its dis...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l also push their development behind.   To recapitulate, although the migration ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13688212928 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88684566496 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596958174905 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.446418098 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4375 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4375 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4375 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223725101888 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749617301001 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758545771363 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146959521079 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755188043893 0.056905535591 133% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.