Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of transport However others think money should be spent on other priorities e g environment cost Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of transport. However, others think money should be spent on other priorities (e.g: environment, cost). Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Government should release the budget based on the priority and doing analysis on previous budgets. Certain demographics of the society thinks that government should spends budget on faster means of transport. While other argues that the more budget should on basics amenities like food, shelter, education. I personally believe that budget should be spend based on the priority of the people. In this essay will discuss about both views.

Firstly, Government should concentrate on increasing the budget and plan the budget in an efficient manner. Most common modes of transport are roadways, railways, airways however these days people are using metros and airways to reach their destination quickly and safely. For a development countries there must be some proportional budget should be spent on the transport. For Instances, countries like japan, chain using bullet trains and making the travel comfort and reach their destinations quickly. In order travel longer distances people prefer airways and railways and reach their distances in less time and also occurrence of accidents decreases.

On the other hand, people in the society needs basic requirements like shelter, food, medical facilities, education in higher priority. Once the basic amenities got fulfilled government can certainly think of advanced requirements. For Instance, countries like Pakistan still under poverty line and not able to fulfill their basic accommodations. In order to build a healthy society everyone in the country must get basic accommodations.

To recapitulate, in my opinion although the argument, spending more budget on faster means of transport seems to be plausible, under scrutiny it is quite clear that the premises are false. In the light of above arguments, it is apparently that government should give priority on basic needs.

Votes
Average: 9.1 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-04-04 j.nikku 56 view
2019-09-22 Venkata Saikiran 91 view
Essays by user Venkata Saikiran :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'spend'
Suggestion: spend
...e society thinks that government should spends budget on faster means of transport. W...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 352, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spent'?
Suggestion: spent
...ersonally believe that budget should be spend based on the priority of the people. In...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient manner" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...creasing the budget and plan the budget in an efficient manner. Most common modes of transport are ro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 137, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...cilities, education in higher priority. Once the basic amenities got fulfilled gover...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, firstly, however, so, still, while, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56583629893 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7994837844 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55871886121 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1568243353 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.75 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28488992558 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097742520512 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081690788665 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174198544457 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092504707362 0.056905535591 163% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.