As the world adjusts its sails to the winds of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, electronic gadgets play an integral part in life nowadays. There is an ever-increasing number of individuals who are beginning to use technology to telecommute. In this essay, I will discuss both the pros and cons of this new development.
On the one hand, the option to work from home is attractive for two main reasons. First, there will be a wider applicant pool among staff. For instance, employees with disabilities might have high chances to have access to employment which are the same as others’ since they do not have to worry about getting to the office because they can communicate with their partners from different parts of the world through video conference. Second, this trend would enable people to slow down environmental deterioration. To be more specific, the reduction in traveling and staff commuting means there is less air pollution, which helps to protect the planet more.
Despite these aforementioned benefits, several drawbacks do exist. One evident weakness is that your personal information or bank details might be stolen by malware as there are many people suffering from this cybercrime. Another negative aspect of this advance would be an increased amount of distractions that you are likely to face at home such as noisy neighbours, family members or social media sites. As a result, your productivity and concentration levels may drop because you could be disrupted easily.
In conclusion, there are plus points to telecommute regarding equal employment opportunity and decreasing environmental problems. However, the downside would emerge consequently in terms of leaking personal information and getting distracted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nal information and getting distracted.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39926739927 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03094020153 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.67032967033 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3959817922 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.285714286 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176648174671 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476205096773 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451276434794 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.07927127871 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058711280798 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.