People equate a good salary with success. Some say that money is not what will make you successful. In your own opinion, what will make a person truly successful? Give specific reasons and examples to support you answer.
Over the past decades, materialism has begot a seismic shift in the sense of success. Although some conventional educators advocate fulfilment should be the morally correct factor for this evaluation, it remains obvious that salary is constantly cited as an evidence of being successful. The aim of this essay is to explore the reasons behind this revolution by reviewing both views.
To begin with, there is ample evidence suggested that the size of paycheque often grow with the contribution one caters. In fact, a position ranked with higher salary are likely to belong to the successful people with either extended knowledge or sophistication. For instance, recent empirical research from the Human Resource Committee ascertained that professionals entailing doctors and lawyers have stayed in the leading position of average salary ranking for past 20 years, and are enormously revered for their importance shaping the societal development. Seen in this light, one’s personal income could be a positive corollary of applause gained from the general public, thus it should be deemed a qualification of success.
Meanwhile, fulfilment is unlikely to quantify the level of success, even though it is invariably a source of happiness. This is because the high turnover rate in most industries is mainly attributed to the temptation of salary rather than the failure of acquiring a sense of success in one’s previous profession. In fact, being interviewed by the Workforce Society, 70% respondents admitted that they prioritise the amount of annual income as the major concern in job hunting. Consequently, in this materialistic era, it is widely believed that success should be rewarded by money rather than merely a spiritual sense of fulfilment.
In conclusion, money have a vital significance in modern life, thus such pivotal components constitute a equitable measurement of being successful. It is predicted that personal revenue will outweigh anything else in the evaluation of success in foreseeable future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-23 | RockyGagKy | 57 | view |
- Scientists agree that many people are eating too much junk food and it is damaging their health. Some people think that this problems can be solved by educating people to eat less junk food. Other people believe that education will not work. Discuss both 89
- The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007. 84
- Some people think the media television and films negatively affect people s behaviour Others do not think so How do you think the media affects people s behaviour Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 49
- When computers first appeared on the scene, it was thought they would make us more productive in providing goods and services, smarter and possibly happier. Skeptics claim that the opposite is true as computers have proved disappointing in terms of produc 77
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 667, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...e corollary of applause gained from the general public, thus it should be deemed a qualificati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...thus such pivotal components constitute a equitable measurement of being successf...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50159744409 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04168456145 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613418530351 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4610403961 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.461538462 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151841474104 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055600398807 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389025617942 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921395467107 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0196842831599 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.