People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world what are the reasons and how can people learn more about the natural world?
Nowadays, the fundamental ground of natural world is limited. While there are several criterion of this issue, people could take actions into tackle it.
It is universal that citizens have a modest knowledge about the essential of wild life for some following factors. first of all, there are a huge range of knowledge for individuals to explore, which depends on their own interests. people tend to be attracted by events related to their daily lives such as economics, politics or music concerts and so on rather than those happening in the jungles or under the oceans. For example, a person who is interested in art could not pay his attention to environmental degradation, ozone layer depletion or biodiversity loss. The second reason is financial burdens on people's shoulders distracting them from learning about natural beauty and its importance. They spend most of time working so hard, which does not allow them to take part in any courses or social programs about nature.
However, there are various appropriate solutions to raise public's awareness of natural world. The first method is governments should make significant efforts to build natural places like national parks, wild animal exhibitions and so on. this gives their residents chances to have deep insights and open their horizons about wild life. Besides, entrepreneurs could come up with numerous business ideas about nature. Producing new exciting TV programs or reality shows not only helps them to gain profit but also educates watchers to what extent natural world plays a crucial role in our life. this step could help enhance the concentrate of society on protecting environment and animals' habitats.
In conclusion, worldwide residents have shortage of understanding how important nature is because of some pre-mentioned reasons. However, there are various solutions for them to easily approach this topic.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-22 | Nhi Nguyen 1807 | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun criterion seems to be countable; consider using: 'several criteria', 'several criterions'.
Suggestion: several criteria; several criterions
...tural world is limited. While there are several criterion of this issue, people could take action...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'criteria', 'criterions'?
Suggestion: criteria; criterions
...rld is limited. While there are several criterion of this issue, people could take action...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 116, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...f wild life for some following factors. first of all, there are a huge range of knowl...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 232, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
..., which depends on their own interests. people tend to be attracted by events related ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 594, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...world plays a crucial role in our life. this step could help enhance the concentrate...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35785953177 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7312806858 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66889632107 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9755771658 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.125 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281990472627 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799939024386 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078963950758 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159878445245 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016202833185 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.