There is a reality that people are increasingly having less knowledge about the role of nature. The most obvious reason for this is the comfortable life in the modern world and citizens can solve this problem by changing their lifestyle.
There are several reasons why modern people have little understanding of the natural world. One of the most crucial reasons is the lifestyle caused by the modern world. The development of technology significantly contributes to this trend of lifestyle. Nowadays, individuals are surrounded by dozens of high-tech inventions with a wide range of utilities, which catch most of their interests and also their time. Moreover, people have to deal with a hectic schedule to adapt to dizzying changes from the surrounding environment. Therefore, they are always busy and tend to spend less time on something that is not in their field or does not directly affect them as nature.
Due to the reason above, tackling this problem is not simple. However, some measures can be taken to reduce this phenomenon. Firstly, citizens should actively change their lifestyle, simply by adding small pots in their room or balcony or even taking part in environmental volunteering activities. Although this may be difficult and complicated at first, if people can persist, they could gain significant changes in their daily life as well as their mental health. Secondly, from the aspect of education, people should be well-informed about the importance of the natural world from when they are at a young age. This solution could be applied by adding nature-related lessons and extracurricular activities to the curriculum.
In conclusion, while the changes in the modern world make many citizens have decreasing knowledge about the role of nature, some measures could be taken to solve this problem including a change in lifestyle and early education.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89484407563 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.527818114 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.4 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262570033808 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102555816414 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126580029116 0.0667982634062 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167182137642 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05115399418 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.