As people live longer and longer, the idea of cloning human beings in order to provide spare parts is becoming a reality. The idea horrifies most people, yet it is no longer mere science fiction.
To what extent do you agree with such a procedure?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
Write at least 250 words.
The cloning of animals has been occurring for a number of years now, and this has now opened up the possibility of cloning humans too. Although there are clear benefits to humankind of cloning to provide evolution experiment, I believe it raises a number of worrying ethical issues.
Due to breakthroughs in medical science and improved diets, people are living much longer than in the past. This, though, has brought with it problems. As people age, their organs can fell for replacing. Therapeutic cloning, which seeks, for example, to use the genetic material from a patient's own cells to generate nerve cells to repair damaged spinal cord is already being used and is distinct from human cloning. If humans were cloned, their organs could then be used to replace those of sick people. It is currently the case that there are often not enough organ donors around to fulfil this need, so cloning humans would overcome the issue as there would then be a ready supply.
However, for good reasons, many people view this as a worrying development. First of all, there are religious arguments against it. It would involve creating other human beings and then eventually killing them in order to use their organs, which it could be argued is murder. This is obviously a sin according to religious texts. Also, dilemmas would arise over what rights these people have, as surely they would be humans just like the rest of us. moreover, I believe that cloning will cost trillions of dollars and be too great a price when humanity has not yet entered the most flourishing stage of science.
To conclude, I do not agree with this procedure due to the ethical issues and dilemmas it would create. Cloning animals is a great step forward in science but to go further to cloning humanity is a huge waste of resources and manpower.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-16 | Luisjackiet | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | Koi | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | cleee | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | tung0303 | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | Luisjackiet | 73 | view |
- There are an increasing number of people who do not know their neighbours What causes this situation How to solve it 78
- Nowadays people are more likely to unaware of their neighbourhoods This essay discusses some of the main reasons behind this trend such as busy life schedule and privacy preferences and then submits a few plausible solutions specifically organizing social 78
- As people live longer and longer the idea of cloning human beings in order to provide spare parts is becoming a reality The idea horrifies most people yet it is no longer mere science fiction To what extent do you agree with such a procedure Give reasons 84
- In the past 100 year there are many inventions such as antibiotics airplanes computer what do you think the most important on the past 100 years Why 84
- There are an increasing number of people who do not know their neighbours What causes this situation How to solve it 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 284, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a patient' or simply 'patients'?
Suggestion: a patient; patients
...ample, to use the genetic material from a patients own cells to generate nerve cells to re...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, for example, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8025477707 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41497048376 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592356687898 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2687787291 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.25 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206113930744 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621055591162 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431946995561 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117720942587 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298883045783 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.