People should focus more on solving problems related to the future, and should not spend time thinking about the past.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued that people should always move on with their future rather than worrying about the past events. While I agree that it is more significant to think about your future rather than past, I think it is also crucial to analyze past mistakes and try not to repeat them.
On the one hand, it is to be admitted that what happened in the past has already happened and there is no way to change it. Always thinking about your past mistakes prevents you from moving on, and it puts you under depression. Due to depression, for instance, one becomes overwhelmed with the feeling of regret, and it is impossible to make reasonable thoughts anymore. Mindful of this, many people strive for bright future forgetting about the past. In this way, they can achieve their full potential in their future.
On the other hand, it is unlikely to make progress without looking back and investigating actions that led you to a failure. Through doing this, you can find out what went wrong and what caused it to go wrong, subsequently you learn how to avoid those mistakes. These experiences and skills will be very practical when you encounter similar problems again in the future. For example, historians are very good at making decisions about the political issues. For this reason looking back is beneficial.
In conclusion, I approve of the idea that it is better to be concerned about the future rather than regretting about the past. However, the fact that examining the past and making reasonable conclusions ensures the bright future should also be taken into account.
- The chart below shows the results of survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 77
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 56
- Th pie chrts below the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 73
- The chart shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were styding full time or part time 100
- The chart gives information about Southland s main export s in 2000 2021 and future projections for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88518518519 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50488959423 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562962962963 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.726911901 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2142857143 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290819912336 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091265186713 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720900457566 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177746396942 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623209557771 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.