The harder you work, the luckier you get. Success and hard work are like two sides of a coin which means they go hand in hand. Every successful person started from scratch. I believe that hard work and determination are the key ingredients for success.
There are great personalities who, even after repeated failures, did not abandon their goals and are now distinguished members of the society. Thomas Alva Edison failed repeatedly before he could finally invent the Electric Bulb proving that perseverance and dedication is the answer to success. One does not have to be born with a golden spoon to be Rich and famous. Take for example, Mr. Sharukh Khan, the reigning star of Indian Cinema, also known as King Khan. Mr. Khan came from a very small village with great dreams. Success did not come easy to him and there were days where he had to sleep on the streets for he had no place to live. Had he given up on his dreams, the world would not have been deprived of the Hero of Romance. Mr. Barack Obama, Mr. APJ Abdul Kalam (Late), Mr. Anil Ambani are only a few examples of people who believed in hard work.
Luck also plays some part in being successful however it is a risky gamble and temporary if not accompanied by hard work. Not every lucky person can get to be successful. People who involve in gambling and betting are those trying to make quick money and get instant success. What they fail to realize is that food or success, both are more beneficial if they are made from scratch and not instant.
Personally I know a friend who loves to bet on cricket matches, placing huge amount of money in favor of one team and hoping that the other team loses. He sure does win sometimes, thanks to his luck, but there are days where he is drenched in debt after losing the bet. Gambling and betting does not leaves a person greedy for more and willing to try out their luck one more time always ending in outstanding dues.
In conclusion, I would like to point out that hard work can beat talent at any given point when talent does not work hard.
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 61
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 95
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 166, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put before the verb 'win'.
Suggestion: sometimes win
...that the other team loses. He sure does win sometimes, thanks to his luck, but there are days...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 301, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leave'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: leave
... the bet. Gambling and betting does not leaves a person greedy for more and willing to...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 301, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'leave'
Suggestion: leave
... the bet. Gambling and betting does not leaves a person greedy for more and willing to...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'for example', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.240291262136 0.247107183377 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.191747572816 0.155533422707 123% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0825242718447 0.0946595960268 87% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0582524271845 0.0501214627716 116% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0485436893204 0.0437548338989 111% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0995145631068 0.122226691241 81% => OK
Participles: 0.0485436893204 0.0403226058552 120% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.24505265651 2.80594681477 80% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0315533980583 0.0326793684256 97% => OK
Particles: 0.00728155339806 0.00163938923432 444% => OK
Determiners: 0.0655339805825 0.0861772015684 76% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0121359223301 0.021408717616 57% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0218446601942 0.011925033212 183% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2070.0 1933.35771543 107% => OK
No of words: 376.0 316.048096192 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50531914894 6.12580529183 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20517956788 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.252659574468 0.374742101984 67% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.170212765957 0.28420135186 60% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.0984042553191 0.203846283523 48% => More words length more than 7 chars wanted.
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0478723404255 0.137316102897 35% => More words length more than 8 chars wanted.
Word Length SD: 2.24505265651 2.80594681477 80% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.037074148 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590425531915 0.56093040696 105% => OK
Word variations: 69.6512251567 60.7387585426 115% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0891783567 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.8 20.7743622355 90% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8849537767 49.517814964 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 127.492653851 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7743622355 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.4 0.814263465372 49% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.99599198397 75% => OK
Readability: 35.8212765957 49.1944974215 73% => OK
Elegance: 1.30081300813 1.69124875643 77% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180743616758 0.332605444948 54% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0758955480018 0.102741220458 74% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.063329174747 0.0668466124924 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.474490058464 0.534860350844 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.166657370794 0.148594505496 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646281628141 0.134430193775 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029623907511 0.0742795772207 40% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.207317130193 0.324371583561 64% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0593875186541 0.0638462369009 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115066517008 0.228012699653 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240774488673 0.058150111329 41% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.68436873747 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.41683366733 29% => OK
Positive topic words: 14.0 5.90881763527 237% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 10.4468937876 153% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.