The performance of staff can have a significant impact on the success of a company. What can companies do to increase staff productivity?
The employees play a vital role in any company. It is irrefutable that the success of a company depends on the performance of its workers. Hence, measures should be taken to enhance productivity and efficiency.
Motivation is considered to be the crucial factor of which contributes to work efficiency. To motivate workers, remuneration should be applied based on the appraisal cycle, which implies the harder they work, the more they gain. On top of that, a divergent factor that also has an impact on the performance is the working space. Comfort is another element that determines the attitudes of the workers towards their work. Enterprises should provide their workers with adequate facilities such as spacious working space, air conditioning and ventilation system, appropriate lighting as well as hygienic sanitation. Evidently, these measures help prevent employees from getting distracted and deliver the expected output.
Apart from these factors, life assurance should be taken into consideration in order to improve the overall work quality of the employees. Periodical health assessment is a measure to ensure workers’ health quality as the specific characteristics of office work require an intense amount of time spending on computers. Moreover, the rational adjustment to the working timetable may boost the morale of the workers. granted that their performances would be at best only if contented and ecstatic emotions are expressed. Furthermore, public recognition as the recompense would also be marvelous as it would inspire other workers to be diligent as well.
To draw a fair conclusion, the performance of the employees is a contributing factor to the success of an enterprise. Therefore, appropriate measures should be taken in order to reinforce the performance of the employees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-19 | sharanbhullar | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-19 | sharanbhullar | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-19 | sharanbhullar | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-19 | sharanbhullar | 56 | view |
| 2021-07-19 | sharanbhullar | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Granted
...le may boost the morale of the workers. granted that their performances would be at bes...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, apart from, such as, as well as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50537634409 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10825645754 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566308243728 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9447818709 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0654025139041 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0289851377302 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519520586743 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0618922251171 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508506504971 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.