Nowadays there are more opportunities for women than there were in the past. Some people think this situation has caused more problems than it has solved. What are your opinions on this?
As gender stereotypes are dwindling, modern women now simultaneously have more opportunities than in the past, which is partially controverted to have caused more issues than it was previously unravelled. From my perspective, I strongly object to the given statement.
Irrefutably, children fall victim to dual income families by the virtue of having less time to spend with their parents. In a civilized society, gender roles are fairly distributed and the inherence of men seizing the title of breadwinner is no longer in existence. Despite the fact that women shoulder the financial burden with their male partner, it is the state of affairs that the bond between parents and children is visibly vanishing. As a matter of fact, the issue can undermine a child, resulting in youth crimes or personality deviation.
In contrast, the endeavour of working women subsidizes on a larger scale. By having men and women collectively contribute to economic growth, lucrative impacts are created in the hope of enhancing living standards. With both parents providing financial support, children have more access to a great variety of fundamental needs. The workforce fortified by female labors has evidently proved its effectiveness by depicting a thriving economy. Besides economic growth, gender equality in the workplace indicates that females have the competence to be the leader and the hunter-gatherer. Modern women have risen above prejudice and gradually abolished preconceived ideas about their roles in society.
To draw a fair conclusion, the problems rooted from the fact that modern women are showered with fortunate opportunities have yet to prove its major consequence. Doubtless, females are demonstrating their supremacy and devoting their strengths and values to social progress.
- Some experts believe that when a country is already rich any additional increase in economic wealth does not make its citizen more satisfied To what extent do you agree or disagree 44
- Some people think that governments should spend as much money as possible exploring outer space for example traveling to the Moon and to other planets However others disagree and think governments should spend this money on our basic needs on Earth Discus 89
- Scientific developments in farming always bring major benefits To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Many people argue that exams are the best way to assess people s competence and that no better system has yet been found Others say they are unfair unhelpful and out of date Do you think the benefits of exams outweigh the disadvantages 84
- i 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, so, in contrast, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55636363636 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06579314425 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614545454545 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3719447837 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.142857143 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122965778786 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362196419284 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683007565339 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882526171298 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867789730006 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, so, in contrast, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55636363636 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06579314425 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614545454545 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3719447837 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.142857143 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122965778786 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362196419284 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683007565339 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882526171298 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867789730006 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.