The performance of staff can have a significant impact on the success of a company.
What can companies do to increase staff productivity?
It is an evidence-based fact that the capacity of workforce is one of the substantial factors of the rising economy of a company. There are variety of ways how to enhance the quality of work and service, consecuently, this essay will discuss them.
First of all, if workers are fitter and less stressed, their working time will be more efficient leading to higher level of output. By subsidizing memberships of gyms and sports clubs, employers can motivate their employees to be healthier and thus more effective at work due to the fact that work/life balance of a worker will be improved.
On the other hand, companies can use different financial rewards as an driving force factors in order to achieve high productivity. Employers might set annual target-related payments such as pay increments, perks, bonuses, or incentives for those who archive aimed milestones announcing their names during performance reviews and appraisals, as revalry among employees leads to being more committed.
Similarly, providing regular trainings and having job prospects are indispensable elements in efficacy of a worker. All employees are seeking for opportunities to further their career and acquire more knowledge without leaving work, so it is reasonable to have on the job trainings and internship programmes for career progression, because the more the rate of job satisfaction, the better productivity of a company. A recent research, for instance, conducted in Baku has shown that among all local businesses the most sucsessful one is AF business center which provides monthly trainings with foreign teachers and professors in business and economy field.
Overall, by using of health-related subsidies, ongoing trainings, and some rewards to salaries an enterprise can encourage its employees to be more assadous to produce useful results at work.
- The cart below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of world.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 84
- The cart below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of world.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 11
- The performance of staff can have a significant impact on the success of a company.What can companies do to increase staff productivity? 78
- The cart below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of world.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 78
- The cart below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of world.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... can use different financial rewards as an driving force factors in order to achie...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, similarly, so, thus, for instance, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4375 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05731483444 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642361111111 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7098137843 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.6 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0862345882679 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.034027041495 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0291254252209 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.044928934992 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171506493827 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.