It is said that nowadays personal characteristic such as honor, kindness and trust are valued less than it would be earlier. Instead of this people are became to asses by their position in society and wealth. However, the issue is not entirely straightforward, and arguments can also be made against the idea. This essay will discuss the debate, and give a concluding view.
On the one hand, there were always people who believe that social status and material possession is a key factor to judge a person especially in our days. For instance, the majority of businessman and sports stars are valued firstly for their success, which is expressed in social position, richness and their power. It happens because nowadays it is imposed on society that success is an acquisition of material values and each person should aspire to this. Another factor which cannot be denied that for many people position in society and wealth are recognized as indicator of diligent and hard work. And people, who have toiled during their live and achieved heights, worthy of respect.
By contrast, for many people, myself included, it is sad to see that we exist in the world where society forgot about key values of person and try to replace with others. The five decades ago our ancestors still believe in honor, kindness and trust and human role was higher than now. And, it is not right indicator to assess person because behind the success might be hidden all negative aspects of person such as betrayal, theft or selfishness.
Overall, there is no doubt that the value in judging one's worth has been differentiated from the past when people emphasize more on consumer products and follow the new social standards
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems 96
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 67
- "The rating system for electronic games is similar to the movie rating system in that it provides consumers with a quick reference so that they can determine if the subject matter and contents are appropriate. This electronic game rating system is not wor 60
- Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity. How far do you share this view point? 73
- The following appeared as part of an annual report sent to stockholders by Olympic Foods, a processor of frozenfoods:“Over time, the costs of processing go down because as organizations learn how to do things better, they becomemore efficient. In color 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ss than it would be earlier. Instead of this people are became to asses by their pos...
^^^^
Line 2, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on especially in our days. For instance, the majority of businessman and sports s...
^^
Line 4, column 54, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...e is no doubt that the value in judging ones worth has been differentiated from the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, for instance, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92361111111 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49921862789 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600694444444 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5437243173 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.076923077 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170712029921 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573064044363 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444870713886 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100982391648 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174983131689 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.