A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honor, kindness, and trust, no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Many people argue that the worth of a person is being judged by social placement and the wealthy. Personally, I completely disagree with this view because other factors, such as great behavior and honesty, are still of great importance when judging someone.
To begin with, the main reason why social status and richness are important to determine the value of an individual is the way he earns his accomplishments. It is commonly known that the rich include people who are both talented and intelligent. They are usually given responsibility for crucial tasks that others cannot shoulder. As a result, these individuals quickly gain higher salaries as well as more prestigious social status for their contributions to society. For instance, the richest man on Earth, Elon Musk is admired because of his material possessions and his status as the CEO of Tesla.
Apart from the practical benefits expressed above, I believe that the worth of a person such as honor, honesty, and trust should be considered. In some way, most people form their families, raise their children to be great citizens, and protect their neighborhoods to elevate the value of themselves as well as of others. Moreover, people also build relationships based on those old-fashioned attitudes because those who have these values possess a high profile. For instance, businessmen usually search for candidates who are kind, trustworthy, and loyal as they believe their staff will bring more value to the company. Therefore, the original behavior is really important in proving a person’s worth.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, I strongly believe that richness and social placement are not the way to judge someone. In fact, some old-fashioned values are better ways to determine a person.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-03 | The Lazy Tiger | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-03 | The Lazy Tiger | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-26 | Nyahmeo | 56 | view |
| 2021-12-30 | vuhieuquy | 67 | view |
| 2021-01-12 | Enkh_bold | 67 | view |
- In some parts of the world it is increasingly popular to research the history of one s own family Why do people want to do this Is it a positive or negative development 61
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In many countries major cities have become too big and overcrowded Why is it happening Give the solution to this problem 56
- Students leave high school without learning the way how to manage their money What are the reasons and solutions of this issue 67
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 482, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... contributions to society. For instance, the richest man on Earth, Elon Musk is a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, really, so, still, therefore, well, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21875 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87378991912 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572916666667 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9820606774 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.357142857 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237700938578 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807211472176 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531227004525 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146484899918 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399277065434 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.