A person worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possesions. Old fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seems important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In the past having a good traditional values was more respected than the high social level or wealth. I personally agree that both social degree and the richness are important due to the power on society. However certain essential values cannot be put aside.
On the one hand, the social status and the money we possessed can be used for an approaching media to encourage a better quality of society. People with high status are commonly easier to influence others to do any improvement, such as encouraging them to have a higher education, better sanitation and many more. Similarly, the amount of money has a major role for helping the poor so they would likely have a better quality of life. Due to the high capability for the higher social level and the rich people to improve society’s life, they should be respected well.
Nevertheless, money and the status are not the only aspect to be concerned. Values that are being kept as old-fashioned such as honour, trust and kindness have the equal importance as the society would be ruined if people lose those values. Having those encourages people to do salient things more and more, as the wealthy people would be strict to share if they are not kind or the particular government with strong power would likely to sacrifice the society’s rights for their own welfare unless they consider their honour and loyalty.
To sum up, I tent to disagree if the traditional values are being kept as unimportant although I realise that money possession and the level among society are essential as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-11 | nuniismail | 67 | view |
- GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT IN ARTS, SUCH AS MUSIC AND THEATRE, IS A WASTE OF MONEY. GOVERNMENTS MUST INVEST THIS MONEY IN PUBLIC SERVICES INSTEAD. 11
- A person worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possesions. Old fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seems important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'value'?
Suggestion: value
In the past having a good traditional values was more respected than the high social...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, similarly, so, well, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1296.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87218045113 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65098110726 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53007518797 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.5182019855 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.818181818 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160565628637 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668570004022 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516182982012 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0925288565926 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437752261786 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.