The pie chart and table gives information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000.
The pie chart and table chart shows the amount of seafood imported to the US by different three nations and the total value of fish in billion dollars from 1988 and 2000. As an overview, the highest amount of seafood imported to US by Canada in the first year which replaced by other nations in the last year. Whereas, the estimate value of fish was highest in the last year.
It is clear from the chart that, 60% of the seafood imported to US by Canada in the first year which was almost a quarter in the next four years. While, it recorded as 28% in the 2000. However, China 13% of fish imported to US in the 1988 and it was almost one-fifth in the year 1992 an it increased by 10% in the next eight years. Further, 27% of the seafood exported by US from other nations with 46% and 42% in the next years.
Moving towards the table chart, the total value of fish was greatest in the year 2000 with 10.72 billion dollars which ranged between 6.54 and 8.52 billion dollars in the year 1988 and 1992.
To sum up, there was increase in the total value of fish with the increasing year. Whereas, the amount of seafood imported by China and Canada decreased with increasing year in comparison to other nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-28 | Komalsandhu | 56 | view |
- The chart shows British emigration to selected destinations betweem 2004 and 2007. 67
- Some people think that tgere are things individuals can do to help prevent global climate change. Others believe that action by individuals is useless and irrevelent and that us only governments and large business which can make a differencem 56
- Some people Say that self-employment is better than a job in a company or in a institutions which one is better? 73
- Today there is increase in anti-social behaviour and lack of respect for others. What might have caused this situation? How to improve it? 73
- The chart below shows household spending patterns in the two countries between 1980 and 2008. 40
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
... nations and the total value of fish in billion dollars from 1988 and 2000. As an overv...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...aced by other nations in the last year. Whereas, the estimate value of fish was highest...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lmost a quarter in the next four years. While, it recorded as 28% in the 2000. Howeve...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the 2000. However, China 13% of fish imported to US in the 1988 and it was al...
^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'it'?
Suggestion: an; it
...t was almost one-fifth in the year 1992 an it increased by 10% in the next eight year...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, whereas, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 1615.20841683 61% => OK
No of words: 226.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.37610619469 5.12529762239 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.10080089446 2.80592935109 75% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 176.041082164 49% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.384955752212 0.561755894193 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 506.74238477 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.60771543086 75% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6074555309 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296113147208 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135362043782 0.084324248473 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116239534142 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199266855563 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812996243294 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 50.2224549098 165% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.42 12.4159519038 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.68 8.58950901804 78% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 78.4519038076 36% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.