The bar chart illustrates the proportion of accommodation is owned and rented by the households in England and Wales over the course of 93 starting from 1918,
Overall, it is apparent from the detail supplied that the renting and owning had two contrast proclivity as renting had the downward trend while owning tended to be the most significant increase.
In 1918, the percentage of owned accommodation approximately doubled from just over 20% to 50% in the middle year of the period whereas there was a roughly half from the starting point at nearly 80% to 50%e equal to the owning in 1917. But in the year 1939, both rented and owned had the specialize in changing percentage which mean the owned and the rented' proportion ascended and dropped temporarily more than the following year at merely above 30% and about 70%.
From 1917 to 2011, a similar trend was seen in two households activities like the first course. At the end of the chart, it still had a little contrast when the proportion of owning went down sharply to 65% while it was in an upward trend. As owning, the rented's percentage rose to 37% over the course.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'proclivity' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'proclivities'.
Suggestion: proclivities
...the renting and owning had two contrast proclivity as renting had the downward trend while...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...he year 1939, both rented and owned had the specialize in changing percentage which mean the o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 1615.20841683 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 198.0 315.596192385 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73737373737 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5949768214 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 176.041082164 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 506.74238477 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 16.0721442886 37% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.1571423998 49.4020404114 201% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 156.333333333 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 20.7667163134 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.244688304435 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.084324248473 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151304729494 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 78.4519038076 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 28.5 9.78957915832 291% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.