It is true that artists who perform pop music can earn significantly more money than those performing classical music. While some argue that it is fair for them to earn a fortune; others contend that this is unjustified. This essay will analyze both viewpoints and the reasons why I advocate for the former.
On the one hand, this tendency is believed to be unjust for two reasons. The first is the hard work of classical music performers. In other words, they have to undergo years of intensive training to be proficient in playing classic instruments and performing live on stage, thus they deserve to be paid higher or at the very least on equal footing to contemporary mainstream singers. Moreover, it can propagate a false notion that pop music artists are more talented. More specifically, they would likely be considered to possess superior musical skills and knowledge than those who perform classical music even though they both should be valued due to their certain contributions to a country’s musical industry.
On the other hand, opponents consider it is legitimate for pop stars to earn more money than professionals focusing on the classical genre. Their main justification is they have a short-lived career. Compared to classical music artists who can pursue a long career path as their skills and experience are more appreciated than their attractive appearance, pop stars can only remain at the peak of their career for a certain period of time and easily be replaced by newcomers. Furthermore, it is justifiable for them to earn a lot of money as they have to spend significantly on marketing to keep their name known by the public. For example, Son Tung MTP, a Vietnamese pop star, expended a fortune on clothes and marketing to build up and retain the image of being trendy and stylish to attract his audiences; therefore, he should be given a high income to afford such expenditure.
In conclusion, although both sides have their own merits, I believe that pop artists well deserve a higher income than classical music performers considering their short-lived careers and the expenses they bear. It is predicted that more people will exert themselves to become pop stars in the future to enjoy a luxurious and wealthy lifestyle.
- The table below shows the questionnaire about opinions of club members and general public for the new theatre in one town in 2012 11
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 67
- Some human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem while others think effective measures can be taken to improve this situation Discuss both views and give your opinio 73
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 425, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... the peak of their career for a certain period of time and easily be replaced by newcomers. Fu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in other words, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1886.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01595744681 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83307979142 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529255319149 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.285235383 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.733333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0666666667 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.73333333333 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295749740701 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11297111419 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0975753800456 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21277065234 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03309196491 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.