At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?

The population structure in some countries like developing countries has benn changed in recent decades. The proportion of youth has been accompanied by decline in the proportion of old people. Youth population has a key role in sustainable development in any society. There are arguments on both sides of advantages and disadvantages of this topical debate.
Granted, young people are human capital of each society. Educated and skilled young generation has many positive effect on economy. They can drive economy forward. From practical view point, youthful population provides a growing market for manufactured products, food and services. Subsequently the income of governments from taxes will increase and prosperity in future. The more children and young people, the less money to be spent on health care for elderly people due they are looked after by their children. Also young people as working-age population increase work force efficiency and bring creativity and new entrepreneurship.
On the other hand, juniors need acquire education and related skills to contribute in a productive economy. Currently some developing countries are struggling to educate juniors in high level quality . According to the most recent available data, Pakistan with near 70 percent population below 29 years old has lowest percentage of literacy in world. Also countries anticipating rapid growth in number of young generation face increasing unemployment. Labor market is not able to absorb young and productive work force. If the human capital investment falls short and young work force cannot find job the rate of depression, crime and poverty will be increased.
In conclusion, I believe educated young generation provides progress in countries as they are fresh, energetic and have new ideas. But it is necessary to be considered by governments to balance age groups and has plan for needs of the coming generation.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 283, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Subsequently,
...nufactured products, food and services. Subsequently the income of governments from taxes wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 362, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...from taxes will increase and prosperity in future. The more children and young people, th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 515, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...hey are looked after by their children. Also young people as working-age population ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...to educate juniors in high level quality . According to the most recent available ...
^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'has the lowest'.
Suggestion: has the lowest
...0 percent population below 29 years old has lowest percentage of literacy in world. Also c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...lowest percentage of literacy in world. Also countries anticipating rapid growth in ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 213, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'planned'.
Suggestion: planned
...vernments to balance age groups and has plan for needs of the coming generation.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46127946128 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96308534815 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616161616162 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3058280418 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3684210526 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6315789474 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180735159726 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493485573959 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039941685154 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102215475586 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467319596529 0.056905535591 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.