Present a written argument or case to an educated non-specialist audience on the following topic:
Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others.
To what extent is this style of management effective?
Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
The industries are taking various steps to reward their workers for their extra-ordinary efforts for the development of the organizations. The most common practice of this taken by higher authorities is to provide incentives. This trend result in a good extent to encourage the staffs to put maximum efforts as well as to challenge themselves at the highest level. However, organizing of various award like best employer with profit share scheme may also exhibit as effective alternatives.
In order to recognize industrious effort from the employees, adding incentive according to various goal is a worthwhile practice. This trend can be seen in every level of companies. Moreover, it is might be one of the best ways to make staffs feel valuable as a good pay check is one of the core factor of job satisfaction. For a job holder, a good salary with bonuses not only encourage to work hard but also makes them feel important. To cite an example, according to research made by Chicago University, achievable goals with bonuses is a pivotal factor among the employees development.
On the other hand, this trend may create a sense of jealousy among the colleagues. Therefore creating a process of voting among the workers for monthly or yearly award where the winner will receive a generous paycheck or the highest share of company profit may produce a better outcome. Due to public voting, mentioned method will decrease the disputes and everyone likely to maintain a good relationship with each other. A famous tech vendor named "Walton" follows this scheme to reward their top five candidates. As a result, a competitive and hardworking mindset can be seen in the industry.
In a nutshell, rewards play a vital role in job satisfaction. Addition of incentives for good performance is a well-known practice which works at a greater extent. Nevertheless, arranging awards through public voting with profit share is also a considerable alternative.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-25 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 84 | view |
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 11
- Nowadays more people prefer to communicate via text message and email instead of face to face Why do you think this is the best way When is face to face communication necessary 89
- he charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 84
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site 78
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed in the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...h bonuses is a pivotal factor among the employees development. On the other hand, thi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...sense of jealousy among the colleagues. Therefore creating a process of voting among the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, as to, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16927899687 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04535733779 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583072100313 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1068196072 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41176470588 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175972929648 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513943009195 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441604359942 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104021512086 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306808119336 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.