Public money should be spent on treating illnesses rather than promoting healthy life style. Do you agree or disagree?

Health issues have been widely concerned over the recent years. Since the arrival of modern technology, the tendency of people live sedentary life styles is not uncommon. It is often argued that public funding should be utilized in curing the ailment instead of facilitating healthy habit. In my view, I completely disagree with the given statement and I believe promoting a healthy life style is more important.

It is indisputable that popularizing the healthy life style is essential to the entire citizens. Making people cultivate the habit of exercise would not only facilitate human physical and mental health status, but also protect them from suffering illnesses. A case in point is that the government establishes more and more multi-functional gyms with various sport facilities inside. These gyms provide more opportunities not merely provide opportunities for people to exercise, but cater people by its diverse facilities. As a result, it is pivotal to promote the whole citizens to live a healthy life style.

In addition, it is vital to facilitate healthy life style by education. Making the public be aware of the importance of health is an effective way to prevent people plagued by ailment. A salient example of this can be seen in the fact that educators impart the comprehensive knowledge and common sense to the students at every educational institution. Moreover, the speech with regard to healthy life style is increasingly widespread throughout the country. In this case, people could be well-informed on the importance of health, which could lead to a healthy life style. Accordingly, education of health is essential.

By way of conclusion, as I argued above, I am convinced that bolstering healthy life style is more important treating the illness owing to the fact that only people aware the importance of health would the occurrence of illnesses be curtailed.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, moreover, so, well, in addition, as a result, in my view, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27062706271 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98109515058 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541254125413 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0109361711 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8125 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263923623281 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933183830828 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764617814788 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174056974913 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471525551467 0.056905535591 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.