QQ9 : With the increasing demand for energy sources of oil and gas, people should look for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such areas？
Recently, the issue of resources has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that although there are a number of disadvantages to developing new areas to acquire natural resources, such as oil, these are outweighed by the advantages, while others argue otherwise. And I wholeheartedly agree with the former stand. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.
On the one hand, those who claim that exploiting undeveloped areas to obtain materials should not be encouraged do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that devotion to gaining oil or gas takes a heavy toll on the environment considering that being equipped with a multitude of facilities that make it possible for developers to find resources with greater ease is necessary. Moreover, developing untouched areas without taking account of the destruction of the environment can lead to global warming. Given these points, some people hold the view that people do not deserve to develop natural areas to secure resources.
My opinion, however, is that making use of natural places so as to get resources exerts a positive influence on humans. Perhaps the principal benefit is that fossil fuel derived from natural places is economical, which helps people to live a better life given that generating renewable energies, including solar power and tidal power, costs a fortune. Furthermore, to provide a hypothetical example, if it were not for making an effort so as to create fossil fuel, humans would be more likely to suffer from a lack of resources that can prevent people from facilitating various aspects of our life, from driving cars to operating businesses. In light of the above, I find these more persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that the benefits of developing natural areas to produce fossil fuel surpass the drawbacks for the reasons discussed above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...r, is that making use of natural places so as to get resources exerts a positive influen...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 438, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...le, if it were not for making an effort so as to create fossil fuel, humans would be mor...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that the bene...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, as to, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20833333333 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80623672721 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.7804951106 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219383330742 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06339641146 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053915556455 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1231893629 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623049402197 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.