QQQQQQQ1: Some people think that the best way to reduce time spent in traveling to work is to replace parks and gardens close to the city center with apartment buildings for commuters, but others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Recently, the issue of converting green spaces near the central area of the city into residential buildings has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that superseding eco-friendly facilities, such as parks and gardens, close to the city centre by housing estates in order to reduce time devoted to commuting to and from work should be encouraged, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I wholeheartedly agree with the former stance. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.
On the one hand, those who claim that people should not remove environment-friendly amenities close the city centre do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that having gardens and parks makes it possible for working adults to take a rest during their lunchtime with greater ease, helping them to unwind. To exemplify, if it were not for green facilities, a multitude of employees would have difficulty alleviating the level of stress, exerting a detrimental influence on their work performance.
My opinion, however, is that it is an effective way of combating a high volume of traffic to transform green places near the CBD into a myriad of skyscrapers to accommodate citizens. Perhaps the most compelling reason is that if numerous workers residing close to their workplaces travelled to work by foot of bike, a large number of other dwellers in suburban areas would be less likely to suffer from traffic congestion. This is partly because the number of personal vehicles on roads would remarkably decrease, leading the masses to have an improved standard of living. Moreover, depriving working people of less time allocated to commuting enables them to focus more on occupations. In light of the above, I find these more persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that destorying green places close the city business district and erecting housing areas are necessary for the reasons discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-12 | idid382003 | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-10 | idid382003 | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-10 | idid382004 | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-06 | idid382002 | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-06 | idid382002 | 78 | view |
- Q10 Developments in technology causes environmental problems Some people believe the solution in these problems is everyone accepts a simpler way of life while others say that technology can solve these problems Discuss both views and give your own opinio 89
- Q15 Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- QQQQQQQ1 Some people think that the best way to reduce time spent in traveling to work is to replace parks and gardens close to the city center with apartment buildings for commuters but others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Q 11 Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays Some people say that countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying out while others say we should concentrate more on problems of human beings Discuss both views and g 89
- Q5 It is not necessary for people to travel to other places to learn about the culture We can learn as much as from books films and the Internet TO what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 317, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...aces travelled to work by foot of bike, a large number of other dwellers in suburban areas would ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that destoryi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23391812865 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9031539273 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605263157895 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7062179514 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.857142857 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263316864188 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742281902635 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543024412244 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146532151496 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591633795515 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.