Question: More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a shore time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses. Why? Who benefit from this?

Essay topics:

Question: More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a shore time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses. Why? Who benefit from this?

These days, it is an increasing trend that youngsters, who from affluent nations, take a year off to work at developing countries as volunteers. There are several reasons to this trend and it is my personal that both local communities and young people reap the benefits from this.

To begin with, a growing number of youngsters spend a short time to volunteer at less affluent countries because of several reasons. Firstly, it is evident that working at other countries is an effective way to learn about these cultures. This allows them to expose to the new environment and acquire a great deal of knowledge, which they could not learn from books or teachers. Secondly, I would content that doing unpaid jobs is better way to help the poor than giving them financial incentives. If they suddenly received a huge subsidies, then it would liable that they will spend these on money on shopping rather than putting their children to schools or renovating their houses.

From my perspective, this trends is beneficial for both the locals and young adults from developed countries. On community scale, unpaid jobs obviously bring economic prosperity for indigenous communities since it costs them nothing. The local authorities, thus, could spend their budget in other key fields, such as infrastructure or health care sector. In addition, local children are given opportunities to access to the free education as well as poverty-stricken people are provided new houses. On abroad volunteer scale, doing unpaid jobs enable them to acquire hand-on experience. In particular, volunteering requires those youngster to collaborate with others from different backgrounds, making them learn some vital soft skills and fostering mutual understanding.

It goes without saying that there are a growing number of youngster, who from wealthy countries, choosing to do voluntary jobs in less affluent countries due to several reasons and this trend also will bring benefits for the local simultaneously.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'subsidy'?
Suggestion: subsidy
...tives. If they suddenly received a huge subsidies, then it would liable that they will sp...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 625, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this youngster' or 'those youngsters'?
Suggestion: this youngster; those youngsters
...e. In particular, volunteering requires those youngster to collaborate with others from differe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, in addition, in particular, such as, as well as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32594936709 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88598399532 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579113924051 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.384769539078 520% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2449788807 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.214285714 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282998930698 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927280622372 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560475312554 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183747477144 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427811530461 0.056905535591 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.