In recent times there is a drastic change within the institute of the family all over the world. Some changes are for the betterment of society whereas few are debatable. This essay is going to shed some light on a few of the changes along with their positive and negative consequences.
There are many changes within the modern family, one of which is an emphasis on working female members. For example, the percentage of the female population that is considered within the working class today is far more than that was in the 19th century. This alteration is definitely considered to be positive in nature as it has seeded the modern values within the community. Another change seen in today's family is better financial literacy among every person of different age groups. Even the adolescent person in the family has better knowledge of handling money which was not the case in earlier times. This empowered the modern family to be stable during the various financial crisis that the world has seen over time.
Although, society is moving ahead with accepting these changes in family roles and structure, there are other changes which have negative ramification to the community. For instance, the number of family members has drastically reduced over the past decade. There might be adverse effects on the economy in the long run as there will be a lesser workforce available at the global level due to the reduction in family member count. Another change that we can see in today's era is the concept of the nuclear family. This idea was a result of younger generation's need of independence by not staying with their old parents. The need for freedom has somewhat negatively impacted the community, as the young generation is not taking care of their dependent parents by staying with them.
At the end, after discussion on various changes that are happening in the family structure and roles we can say some of them are progressive in nature whereas few are having negative impact.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92284866469 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51860444468 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513353115727 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.669348078 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.6875 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0625 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4375 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252127133837 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872800235869 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625467114938 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168238683303 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363279315889 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.