In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes which have occured? Do you think these changes are positive or negative?
Rigorous development of socio-economy internationally leaves huge impacts on people’s life, such as the changes of family structures. Actually, these changes are inevitable once people’s perception and ideology of family structure and its roles have been altered. Personally, I think that these changes are beneficial due to some following arguments.
Some changes of structures of family have been taken place in recent years, especially the dominance of nuclear families instead of extended family stereotype and roles of each member in a family. Firstly, a nuclear family now is considered as a standard family’s structure, whereby usually two parents live with their children. Secondly, roles of family members in a family have been significantly changes. Husband is no longer a breadwinner in a family since his wives now are drawn to go out, secure her own career and make money. As a result, domestic household chores are share to both husbands and wives, which in the past was considered as the women’s work.
It seems to me that these developments are advantageous, despite the fierce objections of some traditionalists. Nuclear family stereotype is conducive for parents in child-rearing since parents have full authority to educate their children. For example, when a child misbehaves, he be punished by his parents which they cannot do when grandparents are around trying to protect him when living in an extended family. As for the changes in roles of husbands and wives in family, I think it is so beneficial. Since following her dream jobs, wives can also double her family’s income, thereby the living standard will be unquestionably improved.
In conclusion, I of the opinion that family’s structure changes in a positive way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-18 | Thuan Hoang | 61 | view |
| 2017-03-01 | Rosemary09 | 78 | view |
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is not popular in many places? How can its popularity be increased? 74
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 73
- People in the community can buy cheaper products nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- Some people think that there should be more strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Many of the world’s cities are currently facing a serious housing shortage. What are some of the reasons for this shortage and what solutions can you suggest? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...or example, when a child misbehaves, he be punished by his parents which they cann...
^^
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...on that family's structure changes in a positive way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, as for, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42805755396 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20904641336 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561151079137 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.524166839 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.785714286 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33940138875 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127441737741 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902234634125 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236291463866 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633543107398 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.