In recent years, the structure of a family and the role of its members are gradually changing. What kinds of changes can occur? Do you think these changes are positive and negative?
It is true that the family patterns and roles of each family member have significantly altered over the last decades in many parts of the world. Personally, I believe these trends bring more desirable outcomes than its drawbacks.
On the one hand, the way how a modern family is structured can be different from the past. Large, extended families, which is the once prevalent type of households, have given way for smaller, nuclear ones. In other words, people no longer live under the same roof with their distant relatives or grandparents as they did 50 years ago. Instead, they enjoy more private space with their children while trying to catch up with their relatives from time to time. Besides, the last century has also witnessed changes in the roles that parents play in their households. While males were the breadwinners in the past, today’s family are enjoying financial support from both working parents, which means females have an equal role to play in aiding their family and in the labor market.
However, these changes yield fruitful results for family and society. Firstly, with the rise of nuclear family units, the pressure of supporting other family members other than their child could be lifted off their shoulders. This means they can be more focused on growing and raising their offspring. With regards to changes in parents’ roles, this helps to free women from the role of just stay-at-home moms and give them the opportunity to pursue their own careers. By doing this, society could enjoy more contributions and talents from the weaker sex and greater gender equality.
In conclusion, family and women, in particular, have benefited from the rise of widely dispersed families and women’s increasing roles in the world of work.
- A person spends most of his or her time in the workplace and life becomes meaningless when there is no job satisfaction To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- oil consumption by major consumers 67
- Society is based on rules and laws If individuals were free to do whatever they want to do it could not function To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement 78
- Should people be allowed to obscure hide their identity online 89
- Research into medical treatments are essential to improve health and fight disease Who do you think should fund this research individuals private companies or governments 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... desirable outcomes than its drawbacks. On the one hand, the way how a modern fa...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, while, in conclusion, in particular, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05841924399 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47085012044 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618556701031 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.364142494 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.142857143 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182346031838 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681935420516 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526427982379 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111910754202 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306908503412 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.