Recently, children are spending much time on TV instead of active and creative things, why do you think this is the case? What measures will be helpful to change this problem?
It is true that in contemporary society, the young are interested in keeping their eyes glued to the TV screen rather than participating in meaningful and creative activities. There are some causes of this tendency and they should be tackled by children’s family and school teachers.
There are two main reasons why watching TV is the most favourable hobby among youngsters. Firstly, modern parents tend to spend less time taking care of their offsprings. This is because the living demand of every household has significantly grown, consequently parents need to work for longer hours to cover their family’s need. As a result, children can not themselves manage the watching time appropriately and are gradually addicted to satellite TV channels. Secondly, some parents are truly overprotective and conservative. They do not allow their offsprings to take part in charitable events or basically hang out with counterparts after school. Therefore, students have no opportunity to get involved in outside active games and in turn, TV programs appear as the easiest way to relax under this circumstance.
Fortunately, several measures could be taken to prevent these mentioned problems. As children these days spend most of their time in school, it is advisable for school management system to organize a larger number of extracurricular activities for students in order to promote creativity and train vital soft skills. If children are encouraged joining these exercises on a daily basis, they would draw inspiration and find other active hobbies to do instead of watching TV. Just as teachers, parents also play an integral part in changing the young’s lifestyle, which means healthy routines and schedules should be created to supervise children’s watching hours at home.
It is clear that there are various explanations for children’s sedentary behaviour and effective steps need to be taken to address this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-09 | Tran MInh Thu | 84 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45033112583 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11785519353 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645695364238 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9757591851 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.571428571 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235812338694 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731372257992 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358191371048 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138093987746 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234080581745 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.