Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. How far do you agree or disagree?
It is believed by some that the government is mainly responsible for dealing with environmental degradation. Conversely, other argue that the problem in question concerns individuals as well. In my opinion, there is clear evidence that the environment is gradually affected by pollution, hence, I think that both the government and individuals must come up with long-term solutions to halt environmental damage.
On the one hand, no matter how despised the government of a country might be, it still represents an influential authority. It is of paramount importance for the government to draw up well-defined and strict policies with regard to combatting global environmental destruction. Furthermore, international cooperation between governments is likely to contribute significantly in reducing pollution.
The government members are usually public figures. Therefore, they should take advantage of this in order to promote ways of maintaing the planet pollution-free as much as possible and to raise awareness among the population of the negative effects a polluted environment can have upon biodiversity and mankind. For example, the government could offer greater incentives so as to encourage people to use renewable energy in greater amounts.
On the other hand, some people frequently neglect the environment. Although a human being is able to survive without food and water for a certain period of time, lack of oxygen and consequently lack of clean air which allows breathing will eventually lead to death. One effective measure the population ought to take is to walk or travel by human-powered vehicles whenever they can instead of driving. By doing this, they would considerably reduce their greenhouse gas footprints. In addition, people should avoid buying products whose packaging is made of non-biodegradable materials.
To conclude, even though I acquiesce that the government has a prime duty to fight against environmental degradation, I strongly believe that major contribution from individuals is mandatorily needed so that Earth's natural can be preserved properly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-08-10 | Daniel2016 | 78 | view |
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton 92
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 84
- If a person is given a choice between life without work and working a lot he would prefer to have a life without work Do you agree or disagree 64
- Some people think it is importat to spend public money on promoting healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment for people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some believe children should have activities organized for them during their free time whereas other think that children ought to plan their own free time Discuss both sides and give your opinion 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...vernment could offer greater incentives so as to encourage people to use renewable energ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ve without food and water for a certain period of time, lack of oxygen and consequently lack o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'conversely', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'well', 'as to', 'for example', 'i think', 'in addition', 'in my opinion', 'with regard to', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.234782608696 0.247107183377 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.153623188406 0.155533422707 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.101449275362 0.0946595960268 107% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0608695652174 0.0501214627716 121% => OK
Pronouns: 0.031884057971 0.0437548338989 73% => OK
Prepositions: 0.133333333333 0.122226691241 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0347826086957 0.0403226058552 86% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.32095054496 2.80594681477 118% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0405797101449 0.0326793684256 124% => OK
Particles: 0.00579710144928 0.00163938923432 354% => OK
Determiners: 0.0782608695652 0.0861772015684 91% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.031884057971 0.021408717616 149% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00869565217391 0.011925033212 73% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2099.0 1933.35771543 109% => OK
No of words: 315.0 316.048096192 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.66349206349 6.12580529183 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20517956788 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.434920634921 0.374742101984 116% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.355555555556 0.28420135186 125% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.292063492063 0.203846283523 143% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.222222222222 0.137316102897 162% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32095054496 2.80594681477 118% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.037074148 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647619047619 0.56093040696 115% => OK
Word variations: 79.0110048971 60.7387585426 130% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0891783567 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.7743622355 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.2333948339 49.517814964 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.933333333 127.492653851 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7743622355 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.13333333333 0.814263465372 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 56.5555555556 49.1944974215 115% => OK
Elegance: 1.63529411765 1.69124875643 97% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0847078146105 0.332605444948 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.064759624288 0.102741220458 63% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0490504820138 0.0668466124924 73% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.543417696357 0.534860350844 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.2084570583 0.148594505496 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0353301564001 0.134430193775 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0259551330749 0.0742795772207 35% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.254557976257 0.324371583561 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0858733797883 0.0638462369009 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0562155917887 0.228012699653 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288995078463 0.058150111329 50% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.68436873747 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 5.90881763527 68% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 2.5751503006 311% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 10.4468937876 144% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.