The restoration of old building in major cities around the world costs enormous amount of money. This money would be better spent on providing new housing and road development. To what extend do you agree or disagree.
Nowadays, it is compulsory that government must be restore old infrastructure in major cities owing to its relates to history and more provide the information about prior culture and tradition. But, some people feel that in modern world development road and housing it's significant for society. In this essay, I am going to examine this question from both point of view.
On the one hand, there are numerous reasons that why authority ought to public funds as use to restore and care to the old infrastructure. These include enhanced employment and popularity. Firstly, tourists also like to go to famous, neat and clean places like old buildings with which they also spend more money for see to old beauty and more chance to learn tradition and culture so for that nearby famous place inhabitants open to bussiness such as hotels and restaurants where visitors always stays and reduce to the unemployment. For instance, in the world there are number of nations but, one of the country in India where more made the old buildings like the golden temple in Amritsar and the taj majal in Agra which are more famous and attractive for tourists.
On the other hand, some individual opine it is better way if government only spend money for city development such as making a highway, railway station and bus station. Secondly, if road conditions would be better then people safely drive and reach to destination and no more than happened road incidents. In additionally, in current century it's very concern issue that in development smart area not ease find out accommodation for this reason it's significant that government make a skyscraper buildings where 10 to 15 families easily lives.
In conclusion, it can be seen that whereas the old buildings has brought some advantages such as employment and more beneficial for tourists, however, building that cannot be restored should be destroyed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-20 | Har preet singh | 84 | view |
- The table below gives information about a restaurants average sales in three different branches in 2016 53
- The table charts given information of attendance in secondary school by pupils in three years 78
- Libraries should focus on improving their technological resources rather than in building a large collection of paper books To what extend do you agree 61
- The table chart given the information that Australia family spend the monthly income on household products in two years. 84
- Describe the information presented below, comparing results for men and women in the categories shown. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... why authority ought to public funds as use to restore and care to the old infrastr...
^^^
Line 2, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gs with which they also spend more money for see to old beauty and more chance to...
^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'better than'?
Suggestion: better than
.... Secondly, if road conditions would be better then people safely drive and reach to destin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...dly, if road conditions would be better then people safely drive and reach to destin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02866242038 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76060280133 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592356687898 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.6792445172 49.4020404114 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.545454545 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5454545455 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1818181818 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201958615372 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743415031773 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407276039225 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129334835216 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307671162177 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.