Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure It would be more benefical to spend this money to build new houses and roads. To what extend do you agree?
In contemporary era, government spend vast amount of money to restore the old buildings. However, other people think that regime utilise their money to construct new houses and roads. This essay shall consider both perspectives and end at a personal approach.
There are mainfold points to share up the former viewpoint. First and foremost, these edifices perserve the old culture and traditions while, these structures were build by ancestors. These are few things in which posterity feel proud when they see these buildings. Second, these historical buildings are the key factors to initate the growth of tourism industry. These historical building serve as attraction for most tourist and they like to visit these places just to get more knowledgeabout culture. Furthermore, to earn foreign exchange and improve economy, government should spend money to reconstruct the old monuments that tourist and local people like to visit it.
Numerous points can be put down to support the latter statement, To begin with, due to overpopulation, there was a shortage of land so that the authority have responsibility to construct new houses for those people who needed. Although, government should also invest money on roads just to boost country's industrilisation and civilization.
From my nation, both aspects posses with their own significance. But, I would like to adhere that government should spend equal amount of money for both purpose to improve economy and make our country more developed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-06 | varindersingh | 56 | view |
- many museums charge for admission while other are free do you think the advantage of charging people for admission to museum outweigh its advantage? 56
- Advantages and disadvantages of love marriage and arranged marriage 78
- Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure It would be more benefical to spend this money to build new houses and roads. To what extend do you agree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... From my nation, both aspects posses with their own significance. But, I woul...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 235.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39574468085 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8665947261 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.651063829787 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6140225507 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5384615385 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0769230769 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216539767359 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691874732357 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532333141776 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122640312473 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464704136071 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.