Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure. It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience.
In the modern world, improving facilities standards is one of the major concerns. Having realized large government revenue is required for the conversion of old infrastructures, for instance, buildings, people claim that using this amount of expenditure to construct modern facilities such as houses and roads are more advantageous. Although there are some parts of the society protesting this idea, I wholeheartedly agree with this opinion.
There is an obvious reason for those who disagree with this trend. They often argue that maintaining old buildings can help their local areas benefit on both economic and social status. Due to the busy lifestyles in major metropolises, old facilities, especially those containing historical sites, stimulate citizens to get away from the hustle and bustle of their daily schedules. In economic terms, old buildings from the past often attract foreigners to visit and explore local culture, which somehow help indigenous people to improve their business.
In contrast, I totally support the idea that people greatly benefit from the erection of modern buildings and roads. I would like to argue that knocking down aged facilities to make rooms for the new ones positively affects not only the main cities but also rural areas since it can prevent citizens from unwanted consequences. Regarding urban residents, this comes with an insurance that new accommodations will immediately come up to their expectation and prevent from the threat of collapse. In terms of rural areas, such improvements can partly slow down the rate of industrialization, keep the peacefulness and healthy conditions for children to grow. Moreover, the constructions of modern houses and roads significantly protect people from the serious consequences of pollution. The case is worth considering when a large number of new routes and intersections are opened which can gradually mitigate the problematic conditions of traffic congestion in major metropolises. In conclusion, in spite of the requirement of a large sum of money to restore old buildings, people argue that this can benefit major cities significantly. However, I believe that the best for governments is to invest money in the construction of modern facilities to upgrade citizens living standards.
- The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation 95
- The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting t 78
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 725, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of modern houses and roads significantly protect people from the serious conseque...
^^
Line 3, column 821, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ion. The case is worth considering when a large number of new routes and intersections are opened...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1932.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48863636364 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1059491619 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0034258037 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.8 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4666666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197675950484 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642756842252 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434555627125 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134299194184 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202647622503 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.