Rich countries often give financial aid to poor countries, but it does not solve poverty. So rich countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In present duration, many nations face economic issues and other to. Therefore, prosperous countries often provide financial aid to these nations. However, this is not sufficient for them, hence, wealthy nations should provide additional manners for aiding poor nations. I completely agree with this notion and reasons are discussed in the forthcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, there are numerous nations which are suffering from poverty. Therefore foreign nations should provide efficient aids to them despite of financial because this is prominent manner to overcome their conditions. The first and foremost factor for this notion is to give employment to the masses of that countries. In this manner, prosperous nations become wealthy due to their development in all sectors which is followed by employment. Therefore, if these nations set up their some of industrial sectors in those countries which are below poverty line. Thus, this becomes prominent manner for the individuals to become employed and get their efficient wages. Due to this, the economy of the nation lead towards progression and to clear up their poorness aspect.
In addition, the another factor is to be superior infrastructure and their services to. In this criteria, if authorities of rich nations improve the infrastructure if poor countries which includes their organisation, transportation, highway complex and so on. Thus, this also become efficient to those nations which helps them to decline their poverty in such a manner. Because, this factor also proves to be a great bit of development of a nation. Apart from that, if there are superior services including education, hospitality ans so on. This also leads to overcome the issue of poverty. Because, if individuals get quality schooling and health facilities in the manner of government of progressive nations. Therefore, this becomes helpful to poverty leading nations.
To recapitulate, I personally consider that prosperous nations should provide efficient services such as employment, infrastructure improvement and so on despite of financial aid. This becomes more prominent to overcome the issues of poverty.
- Fast food is becoming one part of life everywhere this has bad effects on our lifestyle and diet To what extent do you agree or disagree 69
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this case What can be done about this problem 67
- Some people think the spread of multinational companies and globalization produce positive outcomes for everyone Do you agree or disagree with the statement 61
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sector in Canada in 2005 and 2010
- Nowadays celebraties are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements and this has bad example for young people To what extend do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 77, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...tions which are suffering from poverty. Therefore foreign nations should provide efficien...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nfrastructure and their services to. In this criteria, if authorities of rich nation...
^^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...decline their poverty in such a manner. Because, this factor also proves to be a great ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, apart from, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53939393939 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95027041141 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487878787879 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7266590155 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0476190476 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7142857143 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.80952380952 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156258381295 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521877210848 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679723537187 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115595178995 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422045042368 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.