Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Economically stable nations usually assist poorer nations with financial support, whereas this doesn’t solves the primary issue “the poverty”. Hence, other means of support should be given to the poor countries rather than financial support. I completely agree with this context, as money can only help the country for short term, whereas other fundamental amenities should be established to bring them out of poverty.
To begin with, money is a highly influential factor which decides the growth and socio-economic status of the people and the country. Inspite of being an important factor, it is not enough to judge a countries growth and development. Infrastrucutre, health care facility, education, transportation, employment status, human developmental index also plays key role in deciding countries status. If poor countries where only given financial support, it might not serve its primary purpose if it ends up in the hands of bad politicians or not properly utilized by them.
Hence, basic needs should be made available for all, to ensure that rich countries should help poor countries by supporting them in creating new law, plans for better education, sanitation and job opportunity. For instance, after world war 2 people of japan and south korea were severly affected and devestated by the consequences of the war. United states of America was the super power of that time, it provided both financial and moral support to these countries and provided enough opportunity for their development. In recent times, China is doing the same to many under-developed asian and african countires.
To conclude, I would argue that money alone can’t decide the well being of any country. Developed countries came forward to provide financial aid, but it might not be enough, hence, support should be wholesome to guarentee the best possible outcome of the developing countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-23 | trieu23012021 | 67 | view |
| 2021-03-05 | Gyan | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-23 | trieu23012021 | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-10 | anna103 | 84 | view |
- GIVING BASIC KNOWLEDGE ABOUT PREPARING EXAM 56
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- Our personalities are predetermined as a result of our genes before we are born and there is nothing that can be done to change our character traits To what extent do you agree 61
- many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which may cause many health problems sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[4]
Message: The verb 'doesn't' requires base form of this verb: 'solve'
Suggestion: solve
...financial support, whereas this doesn’t solves the primary issue “the poverty”. Hence,...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...ant factor, it is not enough to judge a countries growth and development. Infrastrucutre,...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, well, whereas, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39393939394 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87908912122 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6499998086 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.230769231 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295091380414 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102903901258 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715904577178 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180241238041 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492950641759 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.