Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who from poor countries. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, more and more countries offer a numerous job for an abroad. Some argue that a plethora of wealthier employers provide opportunity for gifted and smart people from poor societies such as India and African countries. However, there are both benefits and drawbacks to deciding to do this. I totally agree with this decision, and in this essay I will discuss some of the reasons and give examples.
Let’s begin by looking at the advantages of supplying jobs for penurious and intellectual employees. The main advantage of hiring employees from poorest areas could be increasing the income of families. Followed by the expenditure for essentials and needs would be covered. The qualified and sharp-witted workers are demanded in developed countries. This can make decrease the number of poverty rate.
Secondly, obtaining a job from top well-known corporations makes people more motivated because of earnings are far higher than local companies could admire. This kind of contests would be impacted for not only students discovering more knowledge, but also poor individuals who aspire to be promoted. In addition, after acquiring a job, the largest companies encourage a better work/life balance and rewards for successful completed jobs.
Turning to the other side of argument, assessment of employees’ productivity at once is a major problem. Many people from poor countries could be capable and brainy, however, effectiveness their job tend to be unsatisfied by most employers. Therefore, the number of accepting employers from farther countries might be restricted.
All things considered, obtaining an employment in a famous country is never easy. Penurious individuals need to weigh the pros and cons of acquiring a better job, significant salary and so on. Personally, I believe that employers permit to poor society a great deal of job vacancies.
- The graph below show annual water usage (in millions of cubic meters) by industries in some country. 78
- ‘The Internet will never replace traditional course books in schools.’How far do you agree with this prediction? 84
- ‘The Internet will never replace traditional course books in schools.’How far do you agree with this prediction? 84
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- People attend college or university for many different reasons. Why do you think people attend college or university? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...more countries offer a numerous job for an abroad. Some argue that a plethora of wealthie...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 366, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ision, and in this essay I will discuss some of the reasons and give examples. Let's ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'from the poorest'.
Suggestion: from the poorest
... The main advantage of hiring employees from poorest areas could be increasing the income of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in addition, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42808219178 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01350209509 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630136986301 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7531489906 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0555555556 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2222222222 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240670087979 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661601529694 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337972207279 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126498647854 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274826013124 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.