In the course of national economic progress, the imbalanced development between urban and rural areas has become a big concern for the authority, as it may give rise to a series of more pressing issues, which I would illustrate as follows.
Among those problems, the explosion of population in megacities is an inevitable one. Apparently, the sound public facilities and adequate educational resources attract a large quantity of people to flood into cities. Statistics show that in 2006, the total of residents in Shanghai ( a metropolis in China) was about 24. 20 million, of which approximately 40% of them were non-natives. Obviously, under such circumstance soaring house price and the heavy burden on traffic system are deemed as the consequent troubles. Most working class can hardly afford a private home or an apartment and traffic congestion is so common in every rush hour, demonstrating the urban infrastructure virtually cannot satisfy the demands of growing population.
What’s worse, this urban-rural gap may contribute to a vicious circle. As more locals swarm into large cities, the shrinkage of labour force in the countryside is worse, being an obstacle on the way to economic success. In consequence, the slow-paced rural economy renders the gap widens further.
In an attempt to diminish the gap, effective measures are supposed to be adopted and the first step is that the state should allocate more budget for the public service such as medical insurance, education as well as public transport in rural areas. Furthermore, the leading industries in countryside should be supported by government. For example, specific talents and high technology can be introduced to stimulate the agricultural development; historical experts can be hired to restore local cultural heritage so as to boost tourism industry. Only when public facilities were upgraded and local economy thrives, can people work and live in their hometown and the disparity between the city and countryside can be narrowed
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2006, the total of residents in Shanghai a metropolis in China was about 24. 20 m...
^^
Line 7, column 515, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ired to restore local cultural heritage so as to boost tourism industry. Only when publi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, well, as to, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37223974763 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98500733427 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634069400631 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.5494745398 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.642857143 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0957886792412 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0293804580224 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316643839275 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.054196726498 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375436520217 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.