Schooling is no longer necessary, since more and more information is accessible on the Internet, and students can study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, many may hold the view that schooling is of no necessity and students can study at home only because there is a growing amount of information available on the Internet. At the same time, however, there is a body of opinion which claims that schools may still be significant. In this essay I will examine both sides of the debate to seek a conclusion.
To begin with, it is undeniable that Internet makes it considerably easy for students to accumulate knowledge at home, because they can access a variety of information on the Internet. For example, if home study students have some difficulties in learning math, they can tackle them through the Internet, which can render them various solutions. In addition, it is time-saving to engage in distance education since students do not have to spend time on the road to school every day.
On the other hand, however, schools can better manage the students and teach them to good social members. This is because students at school should follow a series of rules and regulations, which can prevent the students from doing wrong things. Moreover, schools can improve students’ study efficiency and help them have understanding of the knowledge from the textbook. Unlike online education offering students a virtual learning environment, schooling provides a real learning scene, in which these pupils can easily focus on what they are learning in class without being distracted by other things.
To summarize, there is no doubt that it is convenient to learn online at home. At the same time, however, students can well behave and absorb knowledge quickly. In the final analysis, therefore, one can only conclude that schooling is superior to Internet education, thereby seldom being unnecessary.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-29 | Frank Chen | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-03 | Mishika sugandhi | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-04 | Frank Chen | 56 | view |
| 2018-12-04 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-04 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both these views and give y 89
- The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 73
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 73
- Now children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time doing sports. Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 61
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: much may; a good deal of may
Nowadays, many may hold the view that schooling is of no n...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in addition, no doubt, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16027874564 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7852473825 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547038327526 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4616715462 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.923076923 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314483982412 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119934116947 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626805809577 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205038659515 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252188068396 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.