Schooling is no longer necessary, since more and more information is accessible on the Internet, and students can study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, many may hold the view that schooling is of no necessity and students can study at home only because there is a growing amount of information available on the Internet. At the same time, however, there is a body of opinion which claims that schools may still be significant. In this essay I will examine both sides of the debate to seek a conclusion.
Admittedly, it is true that Internet makes it considerably easy for students to accumulate knowledge at home only because they can access a variety of information on the Internet. For example, through online education, home study students can easily tackle the difficulties that they meet in learning. However, different from the systematic knowledge classified by the school teachers, the information in websites is rather random, leading students to confuse about what they should learn first.
On the other hand, nevertheless, schools can better manage the students and teach them to good social members. This is because schools tend to set a series of rules and regulations and prevent their students from doing wrong things, and finally guiding them to well behave. In addition, schooling can improve students’ study efficiency. To be specific, teachers at school can communicate with their pupils face to face, which a good way to draw their attentions to class and prevent them from being distracted by the things unrelated to study.
To summarize, there is no doubt that abundant information online can help students learn conveniently. At the same time, nevertheless, students can be well guided and concentrate on study at school. In the final analysis, therefore, one can only conclude that schooling is still superior to Internet education, thereby seldom being unnecessary.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-29 | Frank Chen | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-03 | Mishika sugandhi | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-04 | Frank Chen | 56 | view |
| 2018-12-04 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-04 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- fossil fuels (e.g. coal, oil, natural gas) are the main sources of energy in many countries, but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Is it a positive or negative development? 61
- The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050. 73
- Space research is a waste of money. The government should spend money on improving conditions of people living on Earth. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: much may; a good deal of may
Nowadays, many may hold the view that schooling is of no n...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted by the things unrelated to study. To summarize, there is no doubt that abu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in addition, no doubt, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25177304965 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89451427126 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535460992908 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4026759682 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.923076923 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8461538462 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315683452752 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124131127623 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719770724441 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204217926349 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033001519642 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.