Nowadays, more and more people like to explore faraway natural environments. Many humanists think these activities will cause some crises to local organisms, such as destroying their habitat, effect on the food chain, and overexploitation's issue, etc. Some politicians believe this exploration assists human to find other resources of the land. In this essay, I will discuss the pros and cons of traveling to remote natural places, and conclude with my personal opinions.
Firstly, many citizens and official people believe these natural territories possess many physical resources; for example, fossil fuel and rare species. These natural conditions can assist human to overcome many issues, such as improving the price of fuel and studying medicines for rare diseases. Moreover, developing these places can improve these countries' tourism. Take Iceland as an example, this place attracts many urban folks, because it has much beautiful scenery; for instance, the polar lights and the natural lagoon.
However, some moralists think people and governments should avoid developing these lands because it will result in many bad phenomena. Over-development will damage the natural habitats and cause many rare creatures to face extinction's problem. Furthermore, the government is hard to prevent tourists destroying these places. Take the South Pole as an example, many visitors like to over there in order to see whales; however, such activity must crush natural environment. This process will lead to the earth's situation get worse.
To conclude, I disagree the international institution lets people and scientists explore these places. Experts can utilize other methods for medical research; furthermore, citizens can choose other methods to observe this rare environment, such as VR technique. Ultimately, I much prefer to protect and preserve these precious natural resources.
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- Scientist and Tourist travel to remote natural environments, such as South Pole. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- To some people studying the past is the best to help young people function well in the modern world To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures could be effective in helping young people to function well in the modern world 90
- Scientist and Tourist travel to remote natural environments, such as South Pole. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Scientists and tourists can travel to remote natural environments such as the South Pole Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...veloping these places can improve these countries tourism. Take Iceland as an example, th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 503, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
...ironment. This process will lead to the earths situation get worse. To conclude, I ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 13.1623246493 8% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70567375887 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82443413762 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595744680851 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0532917186 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.5625 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142378987285 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470380154956 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372322656236 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.087888745799 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324239224946 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.54 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.