Although people are warned to preserve the environment by scientists, people do not pay attention to limit resources in their usual lives. I personally believe that government should make some statements in order to save limited sources which are gaz, petroleum, electr energy in globalized century.
There are various reasons why many people are not serious about using environmental resources however ecological sources impact people's daily lives and country's industry. Firstly, people pay less money to electr energy or gas, so people think that we have unlimited and cheap resources. Because people do not think strongly about something if they do not pay a lot of money. Secondly, some people do not know how environmental resources are manufactured by engineers everyday and how much money does government spend to produce them. In fact, eighty thousand kilogrammes coal is burned in order to take little electr energy in a small factories.
In my view, government should make some restrictions in consuming natural energy. For instance every family only can use limited electr energy in a day. As a result, environmental resources are protected and government should not spend much money in this method. In addition, if people pay some money to ecological sources, they understand that environmental resources are restricted abd they play an important role in their lives. Another way is that people should imporve their thinking about environment. Parents and teachers should prompt children to save natural energy everyday in every country. So every person must follo social and ecological rules in his entire life.
In conclusion, government should force some restrictions in order to preserve natural resources for young generation
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year 89
- The graphs below show the number of men and women in full and part time employment in Australia between 1973 and 1993 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 84
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contributions to the company by giving them extra money this practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style of management ef 81
- Scientist have been warning for many years that to protect our environment we have to limit use of energy in our daily lives despite warning many people do not pay attention to this What are the reasons and how people can encourage to save environment 87
- Nowadays culture is much the same all around the world when compared to previous times Do you think this a positive or negative development 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 467, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...resources are manufactured by engineers everyday and how much money does government spen...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 635, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'factory'?
Suggestion: factory
...to take little electr energy in a small factories. In my view, government should make so...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 575, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... prompt children to save natural energy everyday in every country. So every person must ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42647058824 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80435431324 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555147058824 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6602558175 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259823443803 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870302332518 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794032328812 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150137993491 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931195507904 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.