Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that it would be a waste of money?
It is apparent that the extinction of mimority languages has been attracting a great number of problems in recent decades due to its profound impacts on society. Although the proposal of governmental disbursement on the preservation of these languages sould reasonable, I think it would be a waste of money.
On the one hand, there are a myriad of reasons why spending on saving these languages does not pay dividends. First, As the majority of educational insitutions offered teaching courses based on international officialy languages, especially English. This means that if Individuals keep using local dialects, they will not have an opportunity of experiencing these standardised learning enviroments, increasing the rate of illiteracy. Second, An increase in citiziens using unpopular languages would be conductive to an higher demand for educational programmes as well as televison movies based on that language. This would require even more governmental fundings for these projectcs than expendidures on language preservation.
On the one hand, there are some subsequent problems when these local languages are eliminated. First, A language of one country is invariably associated with its values of culture. This means that a disapperance of this language would act as a deterrent for the existence of deep-rooted traditions, customs and social norms, leading to the loss of cultural distinctiveness. In addition, Senior generations now can not acquire a new language due to some health conditions. In fact, If A new language is applied and widely spoken, they would be isolated from the society and live in the state of solidarity, which could make them more sensitive to autism.
In conclusion,I believe that it would be a waste of money when it comes to saving local dialects. The citizens are highly recommended to obtain an offical international language for the benefits of better living standards as well as integration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-28 | Albert Armin | 84 | view |
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female study in every subject.Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people say that government should spend money on measures to save languages that are used by few speakers while others believe that it is a waste of financial resources Discuss both views and give your opinion 95
- Overpopulation around the world is major problem, What are the causes of this? How can problem be solved. 89
- A country becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Poor students or students who come from rural areas often find it difficult to have access touniversity education. Some people think universities should make it especially easy for themto study. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 30, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...money. On the one hand, there are a myriad of reasons why spending on saving these...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 516, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...opular languages would be conductive to an higher demand for educational programme...
^^
Line 4, column 682, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...overnmental fundings for these projectcs than expendidures on language preservati...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...make them more sensitive to autism. In conclusion,I believe that it would be a...
^^
Line 8, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , I
...e sensitive to autism. In conclusion,I believe that it would be a waste of mon...
^^
Line 8, column 123, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended obtaining'.
Suggestion: recommended obtaining
...local dialects. The citizens are highly recommended to obtain an offical international language for t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, well, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44224422442 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20251075134 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57095709571 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2908460938 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.785714286 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247805655576 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858562784751 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638944263378 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156033763658 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265806384615 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.