Nowadays, it is the era of globalisation. This has resulted in disappearance of many minor dialects, whereas some are at the verge of extinction. It has ignited the debate, whether authorities should spen money to save such languages or not. I partially agree with the given notion.
To begin with, the lines between the distinct cultures are disappearing as a consequence of diversity of language. It might effect tourism indirectly, which is of courde not beneficial to a country as tourism is good source of income. Thus government ought to save minor spoken languages as a identitiy of diversity and culture.
Moreover, extinction of language also result into extinction of valuable material or knowledge available in that language. One good example here is that the historicians are faile dto understand or read the lines written on the walls of ancient Egyptian monuments because of extinction of ancient Egyptian language. Therefore, government should try to save such languages.
However, according to some individuals, it is justba wastage of money. Because, the money going to spend on saving minor spoken languages can be spent on other things such as development of facilities like transit, medical, education and infrastructure that are beneficial for economy of nation. Moreover, they also opne that destruction of minor spoken languages is inevitable as people of distinct backgrounds are intermixing with each other. What's more, such languages are of no use because they are neither used in official purpose nor for high level communication.
To recapitulate, government can save minor spoken languages as a identity of culture, if it is wish of public, otherwise these languages are of no use to individuals and their extinction is inevitable.
- Some say that young people are not suitable for decision making positions in governments others however disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 64
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this? 56
- In some countries young people do not take care of their elderly relatives Instead they appoint trained professionals who take care of elderly Is it positive or negative trend according to you 75
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. To what extent do you 61
- The older generation tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live, think and behave. However, some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generations for modern life. To what extend do you agree or disagre 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...ence of diversity of language. It might effect tourism indirectly, which is of courde ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ry as tourism is good source of income. Thus government ought to save minor spoken l...
^^^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ought to save minor spoken languages as a identitiy of diversity and culture. Mo...
^
Line 6, column 446, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...rounds are intermixing with each other. Whats more, such languages are of no use beca...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 64, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ment can save minor spoken languages as a identity of culture, if it is wish of p...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, whereas, as to, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35483870968 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09717656353 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562724014337 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1957767932 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278878123869 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825855744512 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064747824391 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140379370573 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593081573829 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.