several people are declaring the tv programme have to restrict the description about crime.
News frequently illustrating about the criminal issues specifically, but several people consider over the negative impact to the civilisation behaviour. They think having limited showcase would be better. In this case I highlighted agree, yet in the different technic.
First and furthermore, we are as the open-minded society crave to have the up to date informations, particularly for local news. Many people, in more specific parents, are totally worry if their children would imitate the worst acting of the criminals. It definitely normal, because we understand that teenager is in the confusing phase, look for their genuine identity. However, too much anxiety would be more gaining some detrimental to the adolescents theirselves. The detail example is the young people would feel more curious over their parents prohibiting action for them. They tend to proof what is happening in the next.
Undoubtedly, restricting television show about violation is needed, but I prefer to reset the time and scheduling new than destroying every scenes. Put the adult show at the night will be more effective, because no one of the kids are watching any channel. Time for resting and they are guarded by the guardians. Older is the only generation who get agree to consume television programme start from the evening because that is the only time adults have. Aged people will have a keen interest in solving the violation case, for instance the students in college will hold for a moment just to witness the upgrade information, hence they probably get the content for their study.
Tu sum up, there are various ways to separate this kind. furthermore, My self-will stand to protect the originality of tv programme despite it deliver a violator.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'worried'.
Suggestion: worried
..., in more specific parents, are totally worry if their children would imitate the wor...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 58, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...are various ways to separate this kind. furthermore, My self-will stand to protect the orig...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23758865248 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81743335105 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648936170213 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.1426558257 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3125 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1875 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146181631509 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382508818595 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044233727572 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0865717477459 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367810185502 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.