Cooperation can make this world better place for living but dependency can bring the opposite consequences too. Nowadays, some often think that rich countries should assist underdevelop countries with food and education. Alternatively, others believe that it is good for underdevelop countries to solve their problem on their own. Needless to say, it has both merits and demerits. From my point of view I think sharing a bit resource with poor not only a good deed but is also a holy task.
It is true that assistance to poor country from rich country can benefit both countries. For instance, providing resources to poor country might lead to a better trade agreement and a healthy diplomatic relationship. Moreover, if they assist the poor country, it may give them a better chance to access natural resources of poor country or even they can allies in national or international security issues. Apart from being favourable, developed country should assist poor country because many of them own their prosperity to poor country from past exploitation, slavery and colonialism. Therefore, sharing few resources with poor country will not be only showing humanity but is also right thing to do.
In contrast, there are people who believe that instead of taking help from other, they should resolve their problem all alone. It is important for a country to avoid interference from rich country to maintain their independency. For instance, Rich nation assistance can destroy their ability to take decision in country’s epidemic situation. However they become fully depended on foreign aid they receive which destroys their ability to grow. Some also think that, if poor nation take assistance from wealthier that might bring exploitation to their country. For instance, Developed country may take advantage to access poor countries natural resources, and they can threat to stop aiding to gain power.
To conclude, Sharing wealth with poorer has both good and bad side. What we should do is that avoiding its bad side and practice the good side.
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the republic of Freedonia.Write a report for a university teacher describing the information shown. 56
- Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the graph below 70
- Average number of hours per week spent doing activities around the home 56
- The line graph shows estimated sales of gold in Dubai for 12 months in 2002 in millions of Dirhams 66
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia is the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 491, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly a good deed but is also a holy task. It is true that assistance to poor count...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'ally'
Suggestion: ally
...ources of poor country or even they can allies in national or international security i...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 348, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...n in country's epidemic situation. However they become fully depended on foreign a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, apart from, for instance, i think, in contrast, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21450151057 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73599609777 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534743202417 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5638786587 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8888888889 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3888888889 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13881878581 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527975888801 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433312374978 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892948948885 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211026454321 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.